Meta Faces Greater Threat Than $375 Million Fine in New Mexico Child Safety Case

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez secured a historic $375 million settlement from Meta earlier this year for child safety violations. But the real battle is just beginning: a public nuisance trial that could force Meta to overhaul Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. The outcome may cost Meta far more than money—it could reshape how the company operates and set a precedent for the entire social media industry. Below, we answer key questions about this landmark case.

What was the historic $375 million settlement about?

In a groundbreaking case, New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez sued Meta (formerly Facebook) over allegations that its platforms endangered children. The state argued that Meta knowingly exposed minors to predators, harmful content, and addictive features. The $375 million settlement—the largest ever in a state child safety case against a tech company—was reached in early 2025. However, this payout was only the beginning. The settlement did not require Meta to change its products; those demands are being decided in a separate phase of the lawsuit.

What is the next stage of the legal battle?

Starting this week, attorneys for Meta and New Mexico are back in a Santa Fe courthouse for a three-week public nuisance trial. This phase focuses on what injunctive measures the judge should impose. Unlike the settlement, which was purely monetary, this trial aims to force Meta to alter its platforms. The state argues that Meta's design choices—such as algorithmic feeds, lack of age verification, and end-to-end encryption for minors—constitute a public nuisance that harms children statewide. The judge will decide whether to grant the AG's requested changes.

What specific changes is New Mexico demanding Meta make?

The state has proposed several sweeping mandates for Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp users in New Mexico. These include:

• Age verification for all users to prevent underage access.
• Prohibiting end-to-end encryption for users under 18, to allow monitoring of messages.
• Capping daily usage for minors to 90 minutes unless parental consent is given.
• Requiring more transparent reporting on harmful content targeting children.

If granted, these measures could fundamentally alter how Meta's apps function in the state—and potentially nationwide if other states follow suit.

Why is the encryption issue particularly contentious?

End-to-end encryption (E2EE) is a cornerstone of WhatsApp and encrypted chats on Messenger. New Mexico wants to disable it for users under 18, arguing that it prevents law enforcement and Meta from detecting child exploitation. Privacy advocates warn that weakening encryption would create a backdoor that hackers and repressive governments could exploit. Meta strongly opposes this, calling it a threat to user security. The trial will test whether child safety concerns can override encryption protections—a debate with global implications.

How could this trial affect Meta's business model?

Meta's revenue heavily depends on user engagement—more time on apps means more ad impressions. Imposing 90-minute usage caps would directly cut engagement among young users, a key demographic. Age verification could also reduce the user base and increase compliance costs. The biggest threat is the encryption ban: if Meta must scan kids' messages, it could undermine trust and lead to regulatory burdens globally. Financial analysts estimate these changes could cost Meta billions in lost revenue and engineering effort, far outweighing the $375 million settlement.

What does this mean for the broader social media industry?

This case could set a powerful precedent. If New Mexico wins, other states may launch similar public nuisance lawsuits against platforms like TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube. The trial's outcome could accelerate calls for federal child safety legislation, potentially forcing industry-wide changes to age verification, encryption, and usage limits. Social media companies are watching closely: a defeat for Meta might open the floodgates for state-led regulation that reshapes how platforms protect—or restrict—young users.